Comedian and HBO host Bill Maher recently predicted a “very likely” victory for former President Donald Trump, highlighting the strategic missteps of the Democratic Party in dismissing Trump supporters and center-right voters.
Known for his sharp wit, relatively moderate views and disdain for political correctness, Maher's insights at the Aspen Ideas Festival provided a sobering look at the political landscape. (RELATED: ‘Sopranos' Star Spills Hollywood Secret In Fox News Interview)
A group of Evanston, Illinois, residents are suing their city government over a $20 million scheme to give away $25,000 each to Black residents as “reparations” for wrongs experienced by past generations.
The nonprofit public interest law firm Judicial Watch announced it “filed a class action lawsuit against Evanston, Illinois, on behalf of six individuals over the city's use of race as an eligibility requirement for a reparations program which makes $25,000 payments to black residents and descendants of black residents who lived in Evanston between the years 1919 and 1969.” (RELATED: San Francisco Debates $5 Million Per Person Reparations Proposal)
The New York Times photo archive, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
“The Evanston, Illinois' ‘reparations' program is nothing more than a ploy to redistribute tax dollars to individuals based on race,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This scheme unconstitutionally discriminates against anyone who does not identify as Black or African American. This class action, civil rights lawsuit will be a historic defense of our color-blind Constitution.”
“Through a series of resolutions, the Evanston City Council created a program to provide $25,000 cash payments to residents who lived in Evanston between 1919 and 1969 and their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren,” JW reports, after filing a class action, civil rights lawsuit which challenges “on Equal Protection grounds Defendant City of Evanston's use of race as an eligibility requirement for a program that makes $25,000 payments to residents and direct descendants of residents of the city five-plus decades if not more than a century ago. Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring Defendant's use of race to be unconstitutional. Plaintiffs also seek an injunction enjoining Defendant from continuing to use race as a requirement for receiving payment under the program and request that the Court award them and all class members damages in the amount of $25,000 each.”
Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons
JW argues “the program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because:”
Remedying societal discrimination is not a compelling governmental interest. Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 505 (1989); see also Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 307 ((1978) (opinion of Powell, J.) (describing “societal discrimination” as “an amorphous concept of injury that may be ageless in its reach into the past.”) Remedying discrimination from 55 to 105 years ago or remedying discrimination experienced at any time by an individual's parents, grandparents, or great grandparents has not been recognized as a compelling governmental interest…
Defendant also has not and cannot demonstrate that its use of a race as an eligibility requirement is narrowly tailored. Among other shortcomings, Defendant's use of race as a proxy for experiencing discrimination between 1919 and 1969 does not limit eligibility to persons who actually experienced discrimination during that relevant time period and therefore is overinclusive. Defendant also failed to consider race-neutral alternatives, such as requiring prospective recipients show that they or their parents, grandparents, or great grandparents actually experienced housing discrimination during the relevant time period because of an Evanston ordinance, policy, or procedure, as Defendant requires for the third group of prospective recipients. Nor did Defendant take into account race-neutral anti-discrimination remedies before adopting its race-based eligibility requirement.
According to JW, the program works as follows:
The first group of persons eligible for the $25,000 payments are current Evanston residents who identify as Black or African American and were at least 18 years of age between 1919 and 1969. Evanston refers to this group as “ancestors.”
The second group are individuals who identify as Black or African American who are at least 18 years of age and have at least one parent, grandparent, or great grandparent who identifies (or identified) as Black or African American, lived in Evanston for any period between 1919 and 1969, and was at least 18 at the time. Evanston refers to this group as “direct descendants.” A “direct descendant” is not required to be a current resident of Evanston to receive the payment.
“At no point in the application process are persons in the first and second groups required to present evidence that they or their ancestors experienced housing discrimination or otherwise suffered harm because of an unlawful Evanston ordinance, policy, or procedure or some other unlawful act or series of acts by Evanston between 1919 and 1969,” Judicial Watch states in the laws.” “In effect, Evanston is using race as a proxy for having experienced discrimination during this time period.” (RELATED: Squad Member Introduces Proposal For $14 Trillion In Reparations)
Judicial Watch states in the lawsuit that “the six plaintiffs satisfy all eligibility requirements for participating in the program as ‘direct descendants' other that the race requirement (the actual number of individuals who are potential class members is in the tens of thousands).”
Judicial Watch is being assisted in the lawsuit by Christine Svenson of Chalmers, Adams, Backer & Kaufman, LLC.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
Donny Ferguson is a professional fundraiser and organizational manager. Born and raised in Texas, he has lived in Washington, D.C. for 16 years. Ferguson also served as Senior Communications and Policy Adviser in the United States House of Representatives, operating one of Capitol Hill's most effective media operations.
Via The End of The American Dream blog by Michael Snyder In 2024, virtually all
At American Liberty News, we eschew the mainstream media’s tightly controlled narrative to provide our readers with real news, real insights, and the means to take action. We seek out insightful coverage – and partner with knowledgeable and experienced people and organizations to bring you the information and insight our readers demand.
We humbly seek to provide the tools and information necessary for our readers to decide for themselves what is true and what is right.
Citizens Sue City Over Scheme To Pay Race Reparations
Bill Maher Confidently Predicts Trump Victory In November
Comedian and HBO host Bill Maher recently predicted a “very likely” victory for former President Donald Trump, highlighting the strategic missteps of the Democratic Party in dismissing Trump supporters and center-right voters.
Known for his sharp wit, relatively moderate views and disdain for political correctness, Maher's insights at the Aspen Ideas Festival provided a sobering look at the political landscape. (RELATED: ‘Sopranos' Star Spills Hollywood Secret In Fox News Interview)
During a conversation with English journalist.
Trump Plans Explosive Ad Blitz During Thursday’s Debate
Arizona Election Worker Charged For Alleged Security Breach
Terrorists And Criminals Swarming To US Under Biden
Supreme Court Allows Emergency Abortions To Resume In Idaho
A group of Evanston, Illinois, residents are suing their city government over a $20 million scheme to give away $25,000 each to Black residents as “reparations” for wrongs experienced by past generations.
The nonprofit public interest law firm Judicial Watch announced it “filed a class action lawsuit against Evanston, Illinois, on behalf of six individuals over the city's use of race as an eligibility requirement for a reparations program which makes $25,000 payments to black residents and descendants of black residents who lived in Evanston between the years 1919 and 1969.” (RELATED: San Francisco Debates $5 Million Per Person Reparations Proposal)
“The Evanston, Illinois' ‘reparations' program is nothing more than a ploy to redistribute tax dollars to individuals based on race,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This scheme unconstitutionally discriminates against anyone who does not identify as Black or African American. This class action, civil rights lawsuit will be a historic defense of our color-blind Constitution.”
“Through a series of resolutions, the Evanston City Council created a program to provide $25,000 cash payments to residents who lived in Evanston between 1919 and 1969 and their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren,” JW reports, after filing a class action, civil rights lawsuit which challenges “on Equal Protection grounds Defendant City of Evanston's use of race as an eligibility requirement for a program that makes $25,000 payments to residents and direct descendants of residents of the city five-plus decades if not more than a century ago. Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring Defendant's use of race to be unconstitutional. Plaintiffs also seek an injunction enjoining Defendant from continuing to use race as a requirement for receiving payment under the program and request that the Court award them and all class members damages in the amount of $25,000 each.”
JW argues “the program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because:”
According to JW, the program works as follows:
“At no point in the application process are persons in the first and second groups required to present evidence that they or their ancestors experienced housing discrimination or otherwise suffered harm because of an unlawful Evanston ordinance, policy, or procedure or some other unlawful act or series of acts by Evanston between 1919 and 1969,” Judicial Watch states in the laws.” “In effect, Evanston is using race as a proxy for having experienced discrimination during this time period.” (RELATED: Squad Member Introduces Proposal For $14 Trillion In Reparations)
Judicial Watch states in the lawsuit that “the six plaintiffs satisfy all eligibility requirements for participating in the program as ‘direct descendants' other that the race requirement (the actual number of individuals who are potential class members is in the tens of thousands).”
Judicial Watch is being assisted in the lawsuit by Christine Svenson of Chalmers, Adams, Backer & Kaufman, LLC.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.
READ NEXT: CNN Lawyers Admit Stunning Trump News
Donny Ferguson
Bill Maher Confidently Predicts Trump Victory In November
Search
follow us
subscribe our newsletter
Trending Stories
Trump’s High-Stakes Debate: Can He Balance Toughness With Likeability?
Intel Officials Warn Of Serious Terror Attack In US Under Biden
Biden DOJ Accused Of Smear Campaign And Retaliation Against Agents
Commentary
Terrorists And Criminals Swarming To US Under Biden
Biden Covers Up Thwarted Illegal Migrant Terror Attack On Marine Base
Woman Who ‘Offended’ Child Sex Predators Gets Harsher Punishment
Should The US Follow Israel’s Lead In Drafting Women And Transgender Individuals?
Tucker Carlson Defends Assange, Who Enabled Espionage Against US
Security
Terrorists And Criminals Swarming To US Under Biden
Biden Covers Up Thwarted Illegal Migrant Terror Attack On Marine Base
Should The US Follow Israel’s Lead In Drafting Women And Transgender Individuals?
Biden’s Disastrous Mideast Policies Increase Risk Of War With Iran
Foreign Affairs
Woman Who ‘Offended’ Child Sex Predators Gets Harsher Punishment
Obama’s Sister Tear-Gassed During Kenya Protest
Princess Anne Hospitalized After Horse-Related Incident
Italy’s PM Blocks Abortion Push At G7, Highlights Weakness Of Global Leaders
Business & economics
Congress Investigating Whether Woke Activists Broke Federal Tax Law With ESG Investment Schemes
Elizabeth Warren For Fairness?
Citizens Sue City Over Scheme To Pay Race Reparations
Poll: Voters Say Taxpayer Interests Should Trump Politics In State Business
heath & science
Supreme Court Allows Emergency Abortions To Resume In Idaho
Supreme Court Bombshell Ruling Accidentally Posted Online: Report
Unforgettable Demise Of NYC Mobster Caught On Camera
Supreme Court To Hear Challenge To Gender-Affirming Care Ban
American Liberty Arms
Bryan Malinowski Is Dead So ATF Could Make A Political Statement
UPS Worker Ambushed, Shot 14 Times By Childhood Friend
10th Mountain Division Gets 3 New Aces For Drone Kills
America’s Major Cities Are Undergoing A Cultural Transformation
At American Liberty News, we eschew the mainstream media’s tightly controlled narrative to provide our readers with real news, real insights, and the means to take action. We seek out insightful coverage – and partner with knowledgeable and experienced people and organizations to bring you the information and insight our readers demand.
We humbly seek to provide the tools and information necessary for our readers to decide for themselves what is true and what is right.
TOP TAGS
TOP CATEGORIES
FEATURES
American Liberty News ©2022 EDM | 1900 Reston Metro Plz | Suite 600 | Reston, VA 20190